Discourse
There is no place of envy and fame in our Islam. Prophet Muhammad pbuh has said “envy and imaan can never co-exist in the heart of a believer”. In another narration “Two hungry wolves sent against a flock of sheep cannot cause more damage to them than a man’s eagerness for wealth and prominence causes to his religious commitment.”
Itrestingly , look at the second type of comparison i,e downward comparison. This comparison is comfortable and makes one grateful to his Lord. In one authentic narration prophet Muhammad pbuh has narrated that “you should look to those who are downtrodden than you”. It has positive effect on our life. It protects us from loving this world, prevents from harmful psychological effects and holds us on thanking Allah. Hence this kind of approach is right for living a life of simplicity and happiness. And thus our Islam is right treatment for psychological problems as well.
Mark Zuckerberg has had just about the worst week a billionaire can have.
A set of stories published by the Wall Street Journal based on leaked Facebook files revealed that the company knew how bad its product was for the emotional health of teenagers, the well-being of American democracy and the spread of conspiracy theories – and that executives let it all slide.
The situation came to a dramatic head this week when the whistleblower who leaked the files, Frances Haugen, a data engineer and product manager who had been placed on a team tasked with protecting Facebook’s “civic integrity,” testified before a Senate subcommittee. Haugen made it clear that the company had no interest in anything but enormous profit, no matter who got hurt.
As if to underscore Facebook’s ongoing travails, the platform crashed on Monday (along with Instagram and Whatsapp, both owned by the company) due to a technical error.
This reckoning has been a long time coming. We already knew that Facebook could manipulate our moods – the company’s “emotional contagion” experiment produced a scandal in 2014. Shoshana Zuboff, author of The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, has described how Facebook’s predictive modeling allowed them to help companies market things to teens at moments of peak insecurity. And the Cambridge Analytica scandal and investigations into Russian trolls have also raised serious concerns about the platform’s role in an ostensibly democratic society.
Some are describing this as Facebook’s “Big Tobacco” moment or suggesting that its “best days are behind it.” Nearly everyone looked with scorn on last week’s defensive testimony by Facebook’s global head of safety Antigone Davis.
We can hope that these hearings will produce more serious regulatory efforts than previous installments of that never-ending soap: drag tech execs into Congress and make them whine. Yet while everyone can agree that tech companies need reigning in, Congress remains a gridlocked disaster unlikely to pass much of anything.
More troublingly, what Facebook is accused of – using huge amounts of data about us to manipulate our moods and politics, or letting others do so for a fee – is the foundation of the modern tech economy. The more we know, the scarier it gets, but can anyone slam on the brakes? It won’t be Zuck.
— Sarah Leonard (@sarahrlnrd) ( AJ+ email)
0 Comments